From d28f30ef4e69d6217f20b758a1e2a14a1c7f3b98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Kovalev <dkovalev@google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:51:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Replacing (raster_block >> tx_size) with (block >> (tx_size
<< 1)).
The new expression is much more logical than previous one. Surprisingly
both expressions give exactly the same set of dependent values
-- have_top, have_left, have_right -- in vp9_predict_intra_block.
Change-Id: I63eb1b592b8c37883b3a0dbb1f3daa271e446109
---
vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c b/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c
index 4746a3abde..86fba05410 100644
--- a/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c
+++ b/vp9/decoder/vp9_decodframe.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static void predict_and_reconstruct_intra_block(int plane, int block,
if (xd->mb_to_right_edge < 0 || xd->mb_to_bottom_edge < 0)
extend_for_intra(xd, plane_bsize, plane, block, tx_size);
- vp9_predict_intra_block(xd, raster_block >> tx_size,
+ vp9_predict_intra_block(xd, block >> (tx_size << 1),
b_width_log2(plane_bsize), tx_size, mode,
dst, pd->dst.stride, dst, pd->dst.stride);
--
GitLab