-
Vadim Zeitlin authored
There is no need for a separate type for "unsigned long" as we don't have special types neither for "unsigned int" nor for "long" and this type was not handled correctly in the ODBC backend that mapped "unsigned int" to SQL_BIGINT, even though the former is almost always 32 bits and the latter is always 64 bits. Simply remove these types to avoid the problem and simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Vadim Zeitlin <vz-soci@zeitlins.org>
4f8bc052